For though I would desire to glory, I shall not be a fool; for I will say the truth: but now I forbear, lest any man should think of me above that which he seeth me to be, or that he heareth of me.
For though I would desire to glory, I shall not be a fool; for I will say the truth: but now I forbear, lest any man should think of me above that which he seeth me to be, or that he heareth of me. Paul insists that boasting in the paradise vision wouldn't be aphron (ἄφρων, "foolish")—because it's objectively true ("I will say the truth")—yet he forbears (pheidomai, φείδομαι, "I spare," "I refrain") precisely because factual boasting still produces wrong evaluation.
The pastoral wisdom is profound: even true claims can mislead if they cause people to think of me above that which he seeth me to be. Paul wants judgment based on observable reality—his ministry marked by suffering (11:23-29), his physical presence "weak" and speech "contemptible" (10:10). Spectacular past visions don't define present ministry; cruciform weakness does.
This verse strikes at Christian celebrity culture: Paul could legitimately promote his extraordinary experiences (they're true!), but refuses because it would create false impressions. Ministry credibility rests on what people see (observable fruit, Christlike character) and hear (gospel proclamation), not marketing mystical résumés.
Historical Context
Greco-Roman culture prized rhetorical self-promotion; philosophers and sophists built reputations on dramatic conversion stories and divine encounters. Paul's refusal to exploit his paradise vision—though it would "win" the argument with false apostles—demonstrates that gospel ministry operates by completely different values: humility, weakness, and transparent accountability to observable fruit rather than marketed credentials.
Questions for Reflection
How can even truthful claims about spiritual experiences become "foolish" if they cause people to evaluate ministry by wrong standards?
What's the difference between credibility based on "what you see and hear" in present ministry versus credibility based on past dramatic experiences?
In what ways might contemporary Christian culture pressure leaders to "not forbear"—to market their spiritual experiences despite Paul's example?
Related Resources
Explore related topics, people, and study resources to deepen your understanding of this passage.
Analysis & Commentary
For though I would desire to glory, I shall not be a fool; for I will say the truth: but now I forbear, lest any man should think of me above that which he seeth me to be, or that he heareth of me. Paul insists that boasting in the paradise vision wouldn't be aphron (ἄφρων, "foolish")—because it's objectively true ("I will say the truth")—yet he forbears (pheidomai, φείδομαι, "I spare," "I refrain") precisely because factual boasting still produces wrong evaluation.
The pastoral wisdom is profound: even true claims can mislead if they cause people to think of me above that which he seeth me to be. Paul wants judgment based on observable reality—his ministry marked by suffering (11:23-29), his physical presence "weak" and speech "contemptible" (10:10). Spectacular past visions don't define present ministry; cruciform weakness does.
This verse strikes at Christian celebrity culture: Paul could legitimately promote his extraordinary experiences (they're true!), but refuses because it would create false impressions. Ministry credibility rests on what people see (observable fruit, Christlike character) and hear (gospel proclamation), not marketing mystical résumés.